Development Of Iago In Othello English Literature Essay

Development Of Iago In Othello English Literature Essay Iago is one of the most interesting and deeply developed characters in the tragedy Othello by William Shakespeare. Using carefully thought-out actions and words, Iago manipulates others to do things in a way that helps him and gets him to reach his aspirations. He is the driving force in this play, pushing Othello and every other character towards the tragic ending. Its first apparent that Iago is just your normal run of the mill villain but he is far more than that. Shakespeare has decided to make Iago amoral which adds a new depth to character and makes his actions even more villainous then they already were. Iago is a very smart character and this only aids him in his villainous ploy. Iago now starts revealing his plot to take down Othello. Being the intelligent character he is, Iago plays on Roderigos feelings for Desdemona and steals money from him. Thus do I ever make my fool my purse. For I mine own gained knowledge should profane if I would time expend with such a snipe but for my sport and profit. I hate the Moor, and it is thought abroad that twixt my sheets hes done my office. I know not if t be true, but I, for mere suspicion in that kind, will do as if for surety. He holds me wellà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ Iago sees it as wasted time and knowledge if he didnt play on Roderigo and get money from him or even use him against Othello. Iago simply sees Roderigo as just being desposable and easy to toy with; just a stepping stone down his path of greed. In this quote he also explains explains one of the major reasons why he wants the ultimate fall of Othello and how he will manipulate Othello into believing that Cassio has had an affair with Desdemona. Along with being intelligent Iago is also a quick thinker and is able to tackle just about any situation that you may throw at him. We first see this when Roderigo is livid once he finds out Iagos scheme but Iago is able to make it seem a better and calm Roderigo down. He took Roderigos anger and twisted it into a way to better along his plan. If Roderigo is blinded by anger then it wont be hard for Iago to make him believe anything. Iagos long term goal is to make Othello look bad and what better way to do that then to make him think his wife is cheating on him? He takes her by the palm. Ay, well said, whisper! With as little a web as this will I ensnare as great a fly as Cassio. Ay, smile upon her, do, I will gyve thee in thine own courtship. You say true, tis so, indeed. If such tricks as these strip you out of your lieutenantryà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ By simply twisting around normal friendly actions he can make anything seem worse and that is just what he does with Cassio and Desdemonas relationship. Cassio and Desdemona are nothing more then simple friends but when Iago sees them interacting in a little more then a friendly way he thinks of a plan to make Othello believe that Desdemona is having an affair with Cassio. None of this would be possible if Iago didnt talk in such natural and vindictive speech. Iago talks in a lot of prose instead verse and that makes him a little easier to understand and get his point across. He also interacts as if he is genuinely trying to help Othello but in all reality he is only helping himself and praying that everyone else will fail. These interactions with other characters have led him to be known as Honest Iago even though he has already planted the seed of tragedy in Othellos mind. Iago is a master of abusing peoples trust to gain more power and further the completion of his goals, and he does this with Othello. He keeps the characters trusting him and believing that he is there for them and helping them until it all comes back on him. Iago is able to keep Cassios trust for as long as he needs it just by doing little favors like this; guaranteeing time with Desdemona. Ill send her to you presently, and Ill devise a mean to draw the Moor out of the way, that your converse and business may be more free. In order to keep their trust he must keep doing things throughout the play for them but keep his ending goal. What appears as a friendly gesture turns into a way to bring Cassio, Desdemona, and Othello down from their high graces. Iago sets up the situation then turns around and uses Cassios good looks, and flirtatious manner with women to play on what he already installed in Othellos mind about Desdemonas fidelity. In the end of the play he completely betrays Cassio and tells Roderigo to kill him. Neither of them are useful anymore to Iago so he sees no reason to keep them around any longer. I have rubbed this young quat almost to the sense, and he grows angry. Now, whether he kill Cassio or Cassio him, or each do kill the other, every way makes my gain. Live Roderigo, he calls me to a restitution large of gold and jewels that I bobbed from him as gifts to Desdemona. It must not be. If Cassio do remain he hath a daily beauty in his life that makes me uglyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ Roderigo was nothing more then a vehicle in Iagos plot and now that he is done with Roderigo there is no need to keep him around and Cassio is the likely man to kill him. Iago has already made Cassio look bad in Othellos eyes and thats all he wanted to do but to Iago he doesnt care whether Roderigo kills Cassio or Cassio kills Roderigo because either way it is good for him. In the end of it Iago has to do it himself all while keeping up his perfect image. While Iago and Bianca are helping Cassio, Iago sends off Emilia to tell Othello but in turn Emilia reveals to Othello all about how evil and vindictive Iago is. Iago kills Emilia because she is nothing more than a nuisance and is the only person that can stop him from getting what he wants, but in the end it was Iago who really stopped himself. Iagos selfishness, scheming, lying and petty revenge are what lead to the death of everything Iago once knew; even himself.

Monomyth: Hero and Family Versus Loyalty

Monomyth: Fact or Fiction? Does every story truly follow the common stages of monomyth? Joseph Campbell first describes the monomyth in his book â€Å"The Hero With a Thousand Faces† written in 1949. In William Faulkner’s story â€Å"Barn Burning† one can look close enough and see the stages of monomyth. In â€Å"Barn Burning† the loyalty to family versus loyalty to the law is tested. The basic structure of a hero’s journey, in this case Sarty, is shown through the three stages Campbell explains.Campbell’s monomyth starts with a departure, initiation, and return. Sarty is faced with all three. Sarty is given a call to adventure, refusal to call, and a crossing of the first threshold. His call to Adventure was while the family had to go to a new place. He and his family were forced to leave by the Justice, he said to them, â€Å"This case is closed. I can’t find against you, Snopes, but I can give you advice. Leave this country and don ’t come back to it† (504). Sarty’s refusal to call is when he hopes it’s all over.All the running and breaking the law with his father he gets so sick of having to take up for his father. After they left town his father asks, â€Å"You were fixing to tell them. You would have told them. † Sarty answered in a whisper, â€Å"yes† (505). The family was living on DeSpain’s land and that is Sarty’s crossing of the first threshold. The initiation in the story is when the hero is initiated into true heroic stature. Sarty faces the road of trials, atonement with the father, and the ultimate boom. The trial he faces of not knowing if he should keep helping his family.His father tells him to go get oil and as he’s going he’s thinking, â€Å" I could keep on, I could run on and on and never look back, never need to see his face again. Only I can’t. I can’t. † (512). The father figure that the family has t o answer to is DeSpain because they are on is land. The ultimate boom is when Sarty actually tells DeSpain what his father is doing to the barn. Sarty cried, panted. â€Å"Where’s†¦Ã¢â‚¬  â€Å"Barn! † he cried. â€Å"Barn! † â€Å"What† the white man said. â€Å"Barn? † â€Å"Yes! † the boy cried. â€Å"Barn! † â€Å"Catch him! † the white man shouted (513).He’s so shook up he can’t even speak clear sentences. After initiation the hero can return in triumph to deserved recognition, although this in itself may not be without trials and tribulations. Sarty refuses to return, takes a magic flight, is rescued from without, and given freedom to live. He takes the magic flight and runs away after telling DeSpain about the barn. He made the decision to run and to not look back, his refusal to return. He made a bold choice to turn away from his family. While running he hears a gunshot, and that rescues him from wi thout.The narrator says,†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦a long, swirling roar incredible and soundless, blotting the stars, and he springing up and into the road again, running again knowing it was too late yet still running even after he heard the shot and, an instant later, two shots, pausing now without knowing he had ceased to run, crying â€Å"Pap! Pap! †Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬  (514). The relief of not having to answer to his father was enough for Sarty, he had his won life to live with any of the people he chose. With that, he was given the freedom to live. One could say that yes, most stories do follow Campbell’s monomyth.Sarty had a hard choice to make in this story but still came out to be the hero according to monomyth. Monomyth is interesting to those who take the time to learn about it. It does apply to stories and movies in modern day. An example would be The Matrix, Star Wars, Lord of The Rings, and even Hangover. There is a fair share of critics, typically saying that not all stor ies are like this. Some may even say this leads to safe movie and book making, thus leading to boring repeats. The same was said about Shakespeare, and his works are famous.

How to Conjugate the Verb Leggere in Italian

Conjugate and use the Italian verb leggere, which means to read, through conjugation tables and examples. It’s an irregular verb, so it does not follow the typical -ere verb ending pattern.It’s a transitive verb, so it takes a direct object.The infinito is â€Å"leggere.†The participio passato is â€Å"letto.The gerund form is â€Å"leggendo.†The past gerund form is â€Å"avendo letto.† Indicativo/Indicative Il presente io leggo noi leggiamo tu leggi voi leggete lui, lei, Lei legge essi, Loro leggono Esempi: Martina legge molto. - Martina reads a lot.Tutti gli alunni di terza leggono autonomamente. - All third grade students read independently. Il passato prossimo io ho letto noi abbiamo letto tu hai letto voi avete letto lui, lei, Lei, ha letto essi, Loro hanno letto Esempi: Ho letto su Repubblica che domani ci sarà   un grande sciopero. - I read on Repubblica that tomorrow there will be a big strike.Avete già   letto il menà ¹? - Have you already read the menu? L’imperfetto io leggevo noi leggevamo tu leggevi voi leggevate lui, lei, Lei leggeva essi, Loro leggevano Ad esempio: Mi ricordo quando ero piccolo e mi leggevi le storie della buonanotte. - I remember when I was little, and you used to read me bedtime stories.Gli studenti leggevano un capitolo della Divina Commedia al giorno. - Students used to read one chapter from the Divina Commedia per day. Il trapassato prossimo io avevo letto noi avevamo letto tu avevi letto voi avevate letto lui, lei, Lei aveva letto essi, Loro avevano letto Ad esempio: Avevo letto tutti i libri di Harry Potter prima dei 10 anni. - I had read all the Harry Potter’s book before I turned 10.Giulia aveva letto un’ottima recensione su questo posto. - Giulia had read a really good review about this place. Il passato remoto io lessi noi leggemmo tu leggesti voi leggeste lui, lei, Lei lesse essi, Loro lessero Ad esempio: A: Ti ricordi quando leggemmo quelle storie dell’orrore? - Do you remember when we read those horror stories?B: Si, mi ricordo! Io lessi la pià ¹ spaventosa. - Yes, I do remember! I read the scariest. Il trapassato remoto io ebbi letto noi avemmo letto tu avesti letto voi aveste letto lui, lei, Lei ebbe letto essi, Loro ebbero letto Tip This tense is rarely used, so don’t worry too much about mastering it. You’ll find it in very sophisticated writing. Il futuro semplice io leggerà ² noi leggeremo tu leggerai voi leggerete lui, lei, Lei leggerà   essi, Loro leggeranno Ad esempio: Leggerai il biglietto che ti ho lasciato? - Will you read the card I left you?Alla fine della recita i bambini leggeranno una poesia di Rodari. - At the end of the recital, our kids are going to read a poem by Rodari. Il futuro anteriore io avrà ² letto noi avremo letto tu avrai letto voi avrete letto lui, lei, Lei avrà   letto essi, Loro avranno letto Ad esempio: Avranno letto le istruzioni prima di montare il tavolo? - Will they have read the instructions before putting the table together ? Congiuntivo/Subjunctive Il presente che io legga che noi leggiamo che tu legga che voi leggiate che lui, lei, Lei legga che essi, Loro leggano Ad esempio: Spero che tu legga molto nella tua vita, imparerai un sacco di cose! - I hope you read a lot in your life, you’ll learn many things. Il passato io abbia letto noi abbiamo letto tu abbia letto voi abbiate letto lui, lei, egli abbia letto essi, Loro abbiano letto Ad esempio: È molto scossa. Credo che abbia letto qualcosa di brutto! - She’s really upset. I think she read something bad! L’imperfetto io leggessi noi leggessimo tu leggessi voi leggeste lui, lei, egli leggesse essi, Loro leggessero Ad esempio: Ho sempre sperato che tu leggessi la mia lettera d’amore. - I’ve always wished you read my love letter. Il trapassato prossimo io avessi letto noi avessimo letto tu avessi letto voi aveste letto lui, lei, Lei avesse letto essi, Loro avessero letto Ad esempio: Avrei comprato quel vestito se solo avessi letto il prezzo!! - I would have bought that dress if only I had read the price!! CONDIZIONALE/CONDITIONAL Il presente io leggerei noi leggeremmo tu leggeresti voi leggereste lui, lei, Lei leggerebbe essi, Loro leggerebbero Ad esempio: Leggerei se non fossi cosà ¬ stanco! - I would read if I weren’t so tired! Il passato io avrei letto noi avremmo letto tu avresti letto voi avreste letto lui, lei, egli avrebbe letto essi, Loro avrebbero letto Ad esempio: Se l’avessimo saputo prima avremmo letto il programma. - If we had known it before, we would have read the program.

The Power and Genius of Alexander Pushkin’s The Queen of...

The Power and Genius of Alexander Pushkin’s The Queen of Spades In Alexander Pushkin’s â€Å"The Queen of Spades,† many aspects of the short story have made for considerable debate among scholars. Pushkin fills an integral role in Russian literary history, and there are abundant research sources to use in analyzing and interpreting his texts. Pushkin is often referred to as the Father of Modern Russian Literature, but until just recently much of the criticism on Pushkin focused on Pushkin himself as the author, the innovative simplicity in his prose, or the political relationship between Pushkin and the Russian aristocracy. Pushkin’s personal life was often the subject of public debate among his readers and the Russian aristocracy,†¦show more content†¦Evelyn Bristol reviewed Greenleaf’s book and determined the thesis stated that Pushkin’s works were endeavors to define and express himself in segments or fragments in romantic style (Bristol 127). In another review by Caryl Emerson, Greenleaf’ s argument is defined as a complete opposite of Bristol’s interpretation. From Greenleaf’s investigation, Emerson expounds that Pushkin attempted to portray nothing of himself in his writing for fear of the honor code that dictated everyday life. It is described as â€Å"pre-psychological age of Russian literature† in that Pushkin did not at all illustrate any characteristics of himself in his writing including personal documents and correspondence with family and friends. The inverse deductions of Greenleaf’s thesis are hardly sporadic. New scholars are unable to determine the best sources of intellectual research when the research that is available is contradictory. Neil Cornwell’s â€Å"Pushkin’s The Queen of Spades† is another article that has received mixed reviews from audiences. In Victor Terra’s review of the study, he congratulates Cornwell on a commendable analysis. He describes Cornwell’s piece as obje ctive and patient. Terras commends Cornwell for his use of the basic